Blog Layout

Four Employment Professional Liability Risks to Watch After the Dobbs Decision

Riskandinsurance.com recently published an article by Courtney DuChene outlining four liability risks for employers to be aware of since the Dobbs decision was reached on June 24, 2022. We are sharing the article below. For further information regarding potential risks and developing policy guidelines to limit exposure, please contact Melinda Malecki at mmalecki@mbhealthlaw.com or Aileen Brooks abrooks@mbhealthlaw.com at Malecki Brooks Law Group, LLC.


By: Courtney DuChene

August 11, 2022


Employers: think the Supreme Court’s recent decision to overturn Roe v. Wade doesn’t affect you? Think again.

 

In the weeks since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision was released, 22 states have either passed new laws or have pre-Roe laws on the books that could be used to restrict a woman’s ability to have an abortion, the Guttmacher Institute reports. A number of other state legislatures are currently considering legislation that would restrict abortion rights, per the Washington Post. 

 

These laws could have ripple effects for employee benefits, professional liability and workplace discrimination. 

 

Health plans that previously covered all forms of reproductive care, for instance, would have to be changed and employers who try to introduce new benefits so that their employees can afford to travel out of state for the procedure could face legal challenges. 

 

Hospitals and medical professionals face even more risk as they may delay care for women seeking life-saving procedures that lawmakers consider abortions. If they act in the best interest of the patient, they could face criminal charges. If they try to seek legal counsel and fail to swiftly treat the patient, they could be hit with medical malpractice lawsuits. 

 

As companies and their insurers try to navigate the murky waters ahead, here are four risks you need to stay abreast of.

 

1) Medical Malpractice Lawsuits


Doctors and hospitals face perhaps the biggest professional liability risk as a result of the Dobbs decision.   

 

Reports have already emerged of hospitals delaying treatment for life-threatening conditions because they could be considered abortions. Treatments for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies in particular have been delayed due to state abortion bans, Today reports.   

 

“I don’t think as long as I’ve been in health care, it’s been this up in the air in terms of people being frightened to provide care for fear of some kind of criminal charge,” said attorney Aileen Brooks with the firm Malecki Brooks.

 

In these types of high-stakes medical emergencies, any delay in care can result in negative health outcomes for the mother. Ectopic pregnancies are particularly dangerous because in those instances a fertilized egg implants outside the uterus, most commonly in a fallopian tube. As the egg starts to grow, it will cause the tube to rupture, killing the mother. These types of pregnancies are never viable. 

 

Among the issues doctors must navigate with extreme care is the language used in “heartbeat bills.” While ectopic pregnancies pose danger to the mother before an embryo forms cardiac valves or a cardiovascular system, the presence of detectable electrical activity in the developing cells is considered a “heartbeat” in some states.

 

“You’ve got a fetus in a fallopian tube. The heart is still beating. That is a medical emergency. That tube ruptures, you can die,” Brooks said. “So patients are getting complications from waiting for so long to do something.”

 

Those cases could result in medical malpractice lawsuits if a woman develops complications due to the delay in treatment. “If there’s any injury to the mother, then that might be a basis for a malpractice action,” said attorney Benjamin Fenton of Fenton Law Group.   

 

“It’s going to be really important for hospitals to decide ahead of time — like now — how they want to handle those types of cases,” added attorney Melinda Malecki of Malecki Brooks. 

 

“Time is of the essence. I think coming up with some guidelines or policy on how those cases should be handled, at least for now, would be a prudent thing for hospitals to do.”

 

Doctors who act swiftly in these cases to avoid malpractice suits should make sure they are documenting the reasoning behind their decisions. 

 

“The physician would have to be very careful about documenting how that decision was made. You would have to do that in conjunction with legal counsel. Maybe even get a court order, if they have time to go down that route,” Malecki said.

 

Physicians may also be accused of malpractice if they refuse to prescribe certain medications to women of child-bearing age even if they’re being used to treat other conditions. Patients with cancer, rheumatoid arthritis or lupus may be taking drugs that could be used to induce an abortion. 

 

“A physician owes a duty to their patients,” Fenton said. “But if the law prohibits a physician from doing something then that is a strong defense for a physician against any malpractice claims. So it is really important that physicians analyze these laws in this changing legal landscape.”

 

2) Abortion Travel Benefits: A Risky Path for Employers


In the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling a number of employers located in states that enacted abortion bans announced that they would offer abortion travel benefits to employees in states where abortion is illegal. Companies ranging from Tesla to Dick’s Sporting Goods have spoken out on the issue, Reuters reported. 

 

“Travel benefits are accepted under most health plans already,” said John Greenbaum, national employee benefits practice leader at Risk Strategies.

 

“Typically, travel benefits have not been for restricted coverages, but more related to the unavailability of services, for instance the need to move an employee to a Center of Excellence. So if somebody’s having a heart transplant and they’re in a rural environment, the health plan will often provide a travel benefit to bring them to a Center of Excellence that is quite accustomed to doing those types of major surgeries.” 

 

Companies offering these benefits could run afoul of state laws and face legal actions. Employers should be especially concerned about states like Texas and Oklahoma where people who aid in or have an abortion themselves can face civil suits. 

 

“There are a couple of states, notably, I think Texas and Oklahoma that have used language like ‘aiding and assisting in interstate travel for the purposes of obtaining an abortion’ that suggests they would deem those criminal activity and look potentially to bring legal action against employers who sponsored this sort of thing,” John Greenbaum said.

 

“The Texas Legislature has empowered any individual in the state to bring civil actions against anyone who assists a person in the state of Texas in obtaining an abortion, including paying for insurance and travel,” added Pam Moore, an employment attorney with McCarter & English. 

 

We’ll have to wait for litigation to play out before we know the true risks employers face by offering abortion travel benefits. 

 

“I’m waiting for the first litigation to be done and I would suspect it’s going to be Texas because the largest law firm [in the state] announced that it was going to provide abortion travel benefits to its female employees,” Moore said. 

 

“It thumbed its nose at the state legislature. So, I would anticipate that litigation quickly in Texas.”

 

“This is going to churn through the courts for a long time,” Greenbaum added. “Employers entering into these sorts of arrangements should certainly consider both legal guidance and talking to their benefits advisors as well.”

 

3) Fertility Benefits Could Be Caught in the Crosshairs


Employers offering fertility assistance benefits in states with abortion bans may need to rework their policies as IVF treatments and other fertility benefits may be illegal under abortion bans that define a fertilized egg as a life. 

 

“States with more restrictive laws on termination and definition of embryos may be impacting the process and certainly increase patient anxiety and planning,” said Peter Nieves, chief commercial officer at WINFertility, a family-building benefits company.

 

Employers may not be as likely to face legal actions, but they may want to preserve their benefits by offering travel benefits to employees who may need to leave the state for IVF. 

 

“Patients are looking for fertility services in nearby states that are not restrictive and transferring embryos when possible to storage facilities in non-restrictive states,” Nieves said. 

 

“The Dobbs decision creates additional consideration for providing patient advocacy and allowances for travel and transportation.” 

 

4) Discrimination Claims



Beyond the legal risks of adopting abortion travel benefits in and of themselves, employers may face discrimination claims from employees as a result of the benefits.

 

These cases could fall into two categories: lawsuits from employees alleging religious discrimination due to the benefit and those from workers who believe the benefits are arbitrarily being applied. 

 

In the case of employees who oppose abortion on religious grounds and allege discrimination, Moore believes that “there really isn’t a whole lot of other bases for claiming discrimination” just because a particular benefit is offered. 

 

Think of it like holiday benefits. An employer isn’t discriminating against Jewish employees just because they give everyone Christmas off. If an employee objects to abortion on moral or religious grounds, they don’t have to use the benefit. 

 

In terms of unequal or arbitrary distribution of benefits, an employee may claim that they are being discriminated against because an abortion travel benefit only applies to a particular procedure. If they wanted to travel out of state for another type of medical procedure, it may not be covered, thus leading to a lawsuit alleging violations of ERISA.   

 

“There is a section of ERISA that says you can’t arbitrarily provide benefits to one person over another,” Moore explained. 

 

Companies may try to skirt this issue by providing blanket medical procedure travel benefits, especially since it’s a common component of health plans, per Greenbaum. That way, the benefit applies equally to all employees, reducing the risk of discrimination claims. 

 

“Some employers are concerned that by providing travel benefits for abortions, they may be discriminating against others based on their particular medical conditions. So they’re broadening their travel benefit policy,” Moore said.

 

This move can also insulate employers against some of the legal risk of offering abortion-specific travel benefits as well. 

 

Of course, some companies may decide it’s worth the legal risk to take a strong stance on the issue. Younger employees in particular have pressured their employers to take a stance on a whole host of political issues over the last few years. With looming fears over the Great Resignation, corporations may decide it’s worth it to take a stronger stance. 

 

“Millennials and Gen Z want companies to take political stances and they’re willing to walk if the company is not ideologically aligned with their point of view,” Moore said. 


To see article: https://riskandinsurance.com/4-employment-professional-liability-risks-to-watch-after-the-dobbs-decision/


Articles distributed by Malecki Brooks Ford Law Group, LLC are advertisements and summaries for general information and discussion purposes only. They are not full analyses of the matters presented, legal, or otherwise, and may not be relied upon as legal advice.

By info 13 Mar, 2024
CMS offers accelerated payments to providers affected by the Change Healthcare ransomware attack. Many of our clients have experienced cash flow disruptions due to the ransomware attack on Change Healthcare, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group. Change Healthcare is the largest health care billing clearinghouse in the country, processing 14 billion transactions annually. The system suffered a cyberattack on February 21, 2024, and has still not recovered operations. Because of the significant financial losses being experienced by health care providers, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has set up an accelerated payment program for Part A and Part B providers and suppliers, called the Change Healthcare/Optum Payment Disruption (CHOPD) program. Advance payments may be up to thirty days of claims payments to eligible hospitals, physicians and other providers and suppliers. (Providers that receive Periodic Interim Payments [PIP] are not eligible.) The program will be administered by the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). To be eligible for CHOPD payments, the provider/supplier must submit a certification to the MAC stating, among other things, that: The provider/supplier is not able to submit claims to receive Medicare payments due to a business relationship involving Change Healthcare The provider/supplier has been unable to obtain sufficient funding from other sources to cover the disruption in claims processing The provider/supplier is not insolvent and does not intend to cease operations. The maximum allowable amount will be 30 days of Medicare claims payments based on total claims paid to the provider/supplier between August 1, 2023, and October 31, 2023, divided by three. Payments under the CHOPD program are not loans but rather advances of Medicare payments. They will be recovered through recoupment as claims are processed and if any balance remains unpaid after 90 days, interest will accrue. Health care providers experiencing disruption in claims submission should submit the form required by the MAC covering their area. A list of MACS is available at https://www.cms.gov/mac-info . For further information, contact us .
By info 28 Feb, 2024
A Primer to Navigate Your Employment Contract/Personal Service Agreement
By info 01 Dec, 2023
The Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) became law effective January 1, 2021 when Congress overrode President Trump’s veto. The purpose of the CTA is to eliminate money laundering and other illegal criminal and terrorist activities that are often conducted through anonymous shell companies. Under the CTA, business entities will be required to report certain information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) of the Department of Treasury. Said information will not be publicly available but may be distributed in a limited number of instances. Who is subject to the CTA and who is exempt? FinCEN has adopted the Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Rule (the “Reporting Rule”) by virtue of the authority granted to it under the CTA. According to the Reporting Rule, a “reporting company” is subject to the requirement of the CTA. Generally, a reporting company falls into two categories: A domestic reporting company - an entity such as a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other such entity that is created by filing a formation document with a state’s Secretary of State or equivalent agency; or A foreign reporting company – an entity such as a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other such entity that is created by filing a formation document in a foreign country but which is qualified or registered to do business in a state by filing appropriate paperwork with a state’s Secretary of State or equivalent agency. While a company may be considered a domestic reporting company or foreign reporting company at first glance, a company may be exempted from the CTA’s requirements if the company falls under any of the twenty-three (23) exemptions set forth in the Reporting Rule. Example of exemptions include, but are not limited to, certain tax-exempt entities, inactive entities, certain large operating companies, insurance companies, banks, and credit unions. In almost all cases, a for-profit entity, such as a medical practice or a practice providing other professionally licensed services, will be considered a reporting company that is subject to the CTA reporting requirements. Not-for-profit entities will be considered exempt from the CTA reporting requirements if they meet any of the following requirements: The entity is an organization that is described in Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), determined without regard to Section 508(a) of the Code, and exempt from tax under Section 501(a) of the Code; The entity is an organization that is described in Section 501(c) of the Code, and was exempt from tax under Section 501(a) of the Code, but lost its tax-exempt status less than 180 days ago; The entity is a political organization, as defined in Section 527(e)(1) of the Code, that is exempt from tax under section 527(a) of the Code; or The entity is a trust described in paragraph (1) or (2) of Section 4947(a) of the Code. What is required under the CTA? Reporting companies are required to file beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reports with FinCEN. These BOI reports shall include the following: Information about the reporting company itself; Beneficial owner information; and Company applicant information. What are beneficial owners and company applicants? A beneficial owner is any individual that: Owns or controls at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the ownership interests of a reporting company, whether directly or indirectly; or Exercises substantial control over a reporting company. Even if an individual meets the above requirements, there are five (5) exemptions including, but not limited to, if the individual is a minor or an agent acting on behalf of a beneficial owner. A reporting company will have at least one (1) beneficial owner, may have multiple beneficial owners and every beneficial owner must be included in the BOI report. A company applicant must be included in the BOI reports filed by domestic and foreign reporting companies that are created on or after January 1, 2024. Company applicants fall into two categories: Direct filers – the individual who physically or electronically filed a reporting company’s formation or registration document with the Secretary of State or similar office; and An individual who directs or controls the filing action – the individual who was primarily responsible for directing or controlling the filing of the reporting company’s formation or registration document with the Secretary of State or similar office. What specific information is required for the filing? For the reporting company itself, The full legal name; All trade names or assumed (DBA) names; The current principal place of business address in the United States, or if the principal place of business address is not in the United States, the primary location in the United States where the company conducts its business; State, tribal, or foreign jurisdiction of formation; For a foreign reporting company, the state or tribal jurisdiction of first registration; and the Employer Identification Number (EIN) or Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) issued by the IRS and, if a foreign reporting company does not have a TIN, then a tax identification number issue by a foreign jurisdiction and the name of the foreign jurisdiction. For each beneficial owner or company applicant, The beneficial owner or company applicant’s full legal name; The beneficial owner or company applicant’s date of birth; The beneficial owner or company applicant’s current residential address; provided, however, that if the company applicant forms or registers a reporting company in the course of their business, then the company applicant’s business address; Unique identifying number from an acceptable non-expired document such as: • A U.S. passport • A State issued driver's license • An identification document issued by a state, local government or tribe • If a beneficial owner has none of the above, a foreign passport; and 5. An image of the document from which the unique identifying number came from. Notwithstanding the above, a beneficial owner or company applicant may provide their respective information directly to FinCEN and obtain a “FinCEN Identifier,” which will be a unique identify number. Reporting companies can these use these FinCEN Identifiers in lieu of providing the above-required information for beneficial owners and company applicants. This is beneficial for a few reasons: (1) filing BOI reports will be faster and more streamlined; (2) it is easier for beneficial owners and company applicants of multiple reporting companies; and (3) it prevents reporting companies access to a company applicant’s personal information. When must BOI reports be filed? Domestic and foreign reporting companies created before January 1, 2024 must file a BOI report by January 1, 2025. Domestic and foreign reporting companies created on or after January 1, 2024 must file a BOI report within thirty (30) days of receiving actual or public notice that the creation or registration of the reporting company is effective. Penalties for not filing The willful failure to file a BOI report or to report false, fraudulent or incomplete beneficial ownership information may result in criminal and civil penalties such as: Up to $500 for each day violation continues; Imprisonment for up to two (2) years; and A fine of up to $10,000 If a reporting company discovers that it reported inaccurate or incomplete information, there is a ninety (90) day safe harbor from the date of the original deadline to provide corrected information. Conclusion This is a broad overview of the CTA and Reporting Rule requirements. More detailed descriptions, exemptions, and requirements are set forth in the CTA and the Reporting Rule. For further information contact us .
By info 12 Oct, 2023
We have received questions from many of our clients about how to properly respond when patients and visitors bring guns into their offices. Here are some facts you need to know in grappling with this complex issue. (This discussion deals with Illinois law; firearm regulations vary greatly from state to state.) The Firearm Concealed Carry Act was passed in 2013, and allows a licensee to carry a loaded or unloaded firearm on his/her person or in a vehicle. However, the Act specifies several prohibited areas where it is illegal for a licensee to knowingly carry a firearm. The list includes medical clinics, hospitals and laboratories. Signage must be clearly and conspicuously posted at the entrance of a facility where concealed carry is prohibited. The required sign must be at least 4 x 6 inches. The Illinois State Police has developed standardized signage, available on their website at https://www.ispfsb.com/Public/Signage.aspx. The Act specifies that when a licensee is prohibited from bringing a firearm into a prohibited area, the person is allowed to store it in their vehicle in a parking facility, provided that it is stored inside a case, not in plain view, and the vehicle is locked. This parking lot exception does not apply to federal property. When law enforcement officials are on duty, they may carry a weapon as part of their official duties, not as a personal right under the Concealed Carry Act. An officer who is off duty coming to a facility as a patient or visitor would be subject to the same restrictions as any other person. Clinics should make sure that the required sign is prominently posted at the entrance. If a patient or visitor brings a weapon onto the premises, staff can point out the sign. Of course, front line staff should not be put in danger themselves and may need the assistance of security or law enforcement if the patient or visitor does not comply. If a patient repeatedly violates the law by bringing a weapon onto the premises, it would be appropriate to terminate the patient relationship. For further information contact us .
By info 04 Oct, 2023
The IRS recently announced that it has suspended processing applications for the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) until at least the end of 2023. The agency claims that it has been inundated by a flood of improper ERC claims, which are being aggressively promoted by companies offering to file claims for a percentage fee. The IRS states that for claims that were filed before September 14, 2023, the agency will continue processing them, but due to increased fraud concerns, processing time will increase from 90 to 180 days. Processing could take much longer if the claim is audited. Auditors have been trained to identify claims posing the greatest risk, and as of the end of July, 252 investigations have been referred to the IRS Criminal Investigation division. The ERC is a refundable tax credit that is available to certain businesses that continued paying employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. To be eligible, the business must have fully or partially suspended operations due to a government order limiting commerce, travel or group meetings due to the pandemic during 2020 or the first three quarters of 2021; experienced a significant decline in gross receipts during that period; or qualified as a recovery startup business for the third or fourth quarters of 2021. Any organization that improperly claimed the ERC must pay it back, possibly with penalties and interest. The IRS stated that it is seeing repeated instances of entities citing supply chain issues as a basis for an ERC claim, which is not a basis for eligibility. For businesses that have filed a claim for the ERC, the IRS urges them to review the program guidelines with a tax professional to determine whether they are eligible. If the criteria were not met, the claim can be withdrawn. The IRS plans to finalize a settlement program in fall 2023 to allow businesses to repay inappropriate ERC claims.
By info 27 Sep, 2023
We frequently provide legal counsel to physicians and other healthcare practitioners when their employment has been terminated or is about to be terminated. Unless the practitioner has an employment contract with the employer which clearly sets forth the circumstances under which employment may be terminated, terminations can generally be for any reason that is not illegal (e.g. illegal discrimination based upon membership in a protected class such as race, sex, religion, etc. or because the practitioner was a “whistleblower”). A termination from employment does not have to be because the practitioner has done something medically wrong. In fact, it is rarely about that. Most of the time, terminations occur because a practitioner is a “bad fit” for the employer, a determination which is made, like it or not, unilaterally by the employer. These terminations are characterized as “termination without cause,” legally meaning “for any reason or no reason,” but they occur because there is just a “bad fit.” As an example, an employer may not like how a practitioner speaks to patients or other practitioners (or both). If that is not corrected in the eyes of the employer, the practitioner may be terminated for cause (doing something wrong), but employers often use the “without cause” termination provision instead to avoid legal hassles and to prevent ruining the practitioner’s career. If you are terminated, regardless of the reason, it is very important to seek legal consultation. You will need to take the necessary legal steps to protect your career and reputation. You will likely need to consider a settlement agreement, release of liability and issues including pay, benefits pay out, malpractice tail coverage, noncompete provisions, reference letters, medical staff privileges and more. Walking away from a job without an agreed upon and executed separation agreement is NOT recommended because you will not have a documented understanding of what to expect and you will have nothing to enforce. Legal skills and experience with this type of matter are necessary to navigate this situation just as having an acute illness needs to be treated by a trained healthcare practitioner. Being terminated from a job is tough emotionally and dealing with legal issues on top of that is stressful. Following are some suggestions to help you should you find yourself terminated: Do not ruminate about how you have been unfairly treated. Instead, focus on moving forward and securing your next job position. Do not think that because your last job was a poor fit that they will all be that way. Instead, look for a work culture that is a better fit for your skills and personality. Do not be tone deaf. If you have been told that you "don’t get along well with others" but you do not see your own role in this, consider executive coaching. Tuning In To Your Own Behavior: Are You Tone-Deaf? (mbhealthlaw.com) Do not expect the legal necessities to be completed overnight. Instead, let your attorney guide you and aim for a Separation Agreement that is in your best interest but keep moving on. Do not think that being terminated makes you a loser and defines you or makes you unemployable. Instead, think that in the not-too-distant future (usually about one year) you will look back on what you will later call a "character building experience." You might even say, “Why didn’t I leave sooner?” Do not be a George Costanza and burn your bridges no matter how tempting. Instead, stay professional and courteous throughout the separation process and after. You do not know when you will need to reconnect. Do not sit around reliving the angst. Instead, do something constructive—what have you been putting off that will make you feel better? Give Me a Minute to Think: The Value of a Month Off (mbhealthlaw.com) Do not be unrealistic about expectations and expect an economic windfall from your employer. Instead, recognize that often the leverage is on the side of the employer and aim to negotiate and resolve the issues that are most important to you. Last but not least, always have your employment agreement reviewed by an attorney BEFORE YOU SIGN. I Did Not Have My Contract Reviewed By An Attorney Before I Signed It. Now I Need To Pull A Rabbit Out Of My Hat! (mbhealthlaw.com) For further information contact us .
By info 23 Aug, 2023
Malecki Brooks Law Group, LLC is proud to continue our communication highlighting the backgrounds and accomplishments of our clients. Name: Don Kalish, CPA, President of the board of the Path to Recovery Foundation (PATH). A 50l(c)(3) organization, PATH is committed to supporting, educating, and promoting recovery for individuals and families struggling with substance use disorders. Known for: Finance and accounting expertise. Being the father of a 29-year-old son who died of an accidental opioid-fentanyl overdose. Business Background: 48 years of financial and accounting expertise in executive positions. He recently retired as the Assistant Vice President of Finance and Controller at Rush Copley Medical Center and is currently acting in a finance and healthcare consulting role with Rush Copley and Rush University. Previous Volunteer Work: With four sons, Don was actively involved in coaching and running youth sports organizations for more than 20 years and held positions on the boards of the Naperville Little League Baseball and Naperville Youth Basketball Association. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Award for Youth & Family by the Naperville Jaycees in 2001. His life changed on May 16, 2016, when his youngest son, Randy, accidentally overdosed. New Focus: Don and his eldest son, Cliff, raised more than $23,000 in donations at the 2017 Naperville Half Marathon and 5K Run for a different recovery organization. Don joined the PATH Board in 2018. Current Role: As PATH Board President, Don leads the foundation in governance decisions and serves as administrator. “We have a great team of clinicians, coaches, and volunteers who work directly with the clients. That’s not my skill set. I provide the support they need to keep doing the great things that they do for clients. I help with structure, organization, finance, and fundraising. Running a not-for-profit is very different than operating a business—completely different rules. I go to Mindy and Malecki Brooks Law Group, LLC, for advice to keep us out of trouble.” His passion: Helping other families to not experience what his family went through with the death of a young adult. Don wants to help prevent overdosing and keep kids free from substance abuse. The PATH helps, but he knows it’s an uphill battle. Opioid relapse is at 70 percent. Colleagues: “Don is a compassionate leader who follows up on commitments and assists those who are in need of guidance. I have always admired Don for his passion for life and dry sense of humor.” Eddie Bedford Supervisor and Director of Road Services, Naperville “Don's role as board president of PATH is fundamentally what elevated PATH from being a small group of passionate individuals supporting a cause to being a structured organization. Don brought his financial and managerial expertise and provided the structure necessary to successfully run a foundation. Aside from Don's professional contribution, his passion and compassion for helping those struggling with substance use disorder is what is most admirable.” Leslie Kawar, Vice President, PATH Board Roar: “Families are ashamed of addiction,” Don said. “At PATH, they can talk with people who understand. You don’t have to go it alone. We have the resources to help. I can’t be prouder of our team and the important work they’re doing to tackle substance use disorders head on.” August 31 st is International Overdose Awareness Day (IOAD). It is a day intended to remember individuals lost to overdose, acknowledge the grief of the family and friends left behind, and renew commitment to end overdose and related harms.
By info 01 Aug, 2023
The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) recently announced that due to “technological system challenges,” it is extending the expiration date for physician licenses from July 31, 2023, to August 31, 2023. This extension does not apply to all physicians. Physicians who are licensed through the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact are not affected by the technology issues, and so the July 31, 2023, deadline remains in place for those physicians. Also, we've been informed that IDFPR is not extending the deadline to complete continuing medical education requirements; those should have been met by July 31, 2023.
By info 13 Jul, 2023
You may have seen or heard the term “PLLC” used in connection with your profession and wondered what it is and whether you should have one. This article provides basic information about PLLCs and whether one may be right for you. “PLLC” stands for “professional limited liability company” and provides the same liability protections as a limited liability company, or LLC. However, under the Illinois Professional Limited Liability Company Act, a PLLC is intended to be used in lieu of an LLC when the owners (members) are using the company to provide professional services that are required to be licensed under Illinois law, such as medical services. Accordingly, there are restrictions as to who can own a PLLC in general and who can own a PLLC together. Only people who are licensed to provide a professional service may own a PLLC. For example, an unlicensed person cannot own a PLLC that operates as a medical practice, even if they hire licensed physicians as employees. Additionally, an unlicensed person cannot own a PLLC with a licensed person if that PLLC is providing professional services. So, for example, a husband MD and a wife who runs the medical practice cannot own the PLLC together. Only the husband MD may own the PLLC. Going a step further, Illinois law also restricts which professional licensed persons may own a PLLC together. A PLLC can be owned by multiple people if those people are all licensed under the same Illinois law or if they are all licensed under related professions. These related professions fall under the following categories: Engineering/architecture Physician/podiatrist/dentist/optometrist Psychologist/social worker/marriage-family therapy/sex offender evaluations Acupuncture/massage/naprapathy/OT/PT/ST To further illustrate this, a physician can own a PLLC with a podiatrist but a physician cannot own a PLLC with a registered nurse. After determining that a PLLC is an appropriate legal entity, the next step is to file Articles of Organization with the Illinois Secretary of State. These Articles vary slightly from the traditional LLC Articles in that they require some specific information. First, instead of the company name ending in “LLC”, the company name must end in “PLLC” or an approved designation thereof. Second, the Articles of Organization must contain a specific purpose clause. This clause provides details about the type of professional services to be rendered and under what law those professional services are governed. Third, the Articles of Organization require the PLLC to list a principal place of business address. In LLCs, people often use their home address or a virtual office address as the principal place of business address. However, in a PLLC, that is not acceptable. Instead, in Illinois, the Articles of Organization must list the address where the professional services are actually rendered. In Illinois, once the Articles of Organization have been filed with the Illinois Secretary of State, the PLLC must also be registered with the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (“IDFPR”). It is not enough to have an individual license; the PLLC itself must also be licensed. IDFPR requires a copy of the filed Articles of Organization to verify the name matches, the specific purpose clause is included, and the principal place of business addresses matches the registration. In addition, IDFPR requires every owner of the PLLC to provide their respective individual license number in order to tie the individual to the PLLC. Now, what if you currently have an LLC but it really should be a PLLC? The Articles of Organization must be amended to include the new “PLLC” ending and to include the specific purpose clause if one has not yet been adopted. Once the amendment is filed, the name change must be updated with IDFPR, the IRS, all other state and federal government agencies for which the LLC/PLLC deals with, insurance companies, credentialing companies, etc. Please reach out to our office if you have any questions, wish to form a PLLC, or wish to convert your existing LLC to a PLLC. For further information contact us .
By info 23 Jun, 2023
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, many strict rules limited the ability to provide services via telehealth. When the pandemic made it very difficult to provide access to in-person care, state and federal agencies introduced flexibilities so that patients could retain access to care. Now that the public health emergency has ended, regulators will face difficult questions about which telehealth flexibilities to retain. On the one hand, both health care providers and patients have come to rely on telehealth for convenient access to care. On the other hand, some limitations may be needed to protect quality and limit potential for abuse. An especially difficult question is, when can a practitioner prescribe a controlled substance to a patient whom the practitioner has never seen in person. The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 provides that, with limited exceptions, a practitioner could prescribe controlled substances only after conducting an in-person examination of the patient. During the pandemic, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) created temporary exceptions so that practitioners could prescribe Schedule II-V controlled medications via audio-video telemedicine encounters, without requiring an in-person medical evaluation. Also, practitioners could prescribe medications approved for treatment of opioid use disorders via audio-only telemedicine encounters. The DEA, along with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), published temporary rules on May 10, 2023, allowing telehealth flexibilities to remain in place for a limited time. Under the temporary rules, the telemedicine flexibilities on prescription of controlled medications will remain in place through November 11, 2023. Also, if a patient and practitioner established a telemedicine treatment relationship prior to November 11, 2023, the flexibilities will remain in place for a one-year grace period ending November 11, 2024. Prescriptions for controlled substances without an in-person evaluation are permitted only for a legitimate medical purpose, and pursuant to communication between the practitioner and patient using an interactive telecommunications system meeting the requirements established in DEA regulations. These requirements permit use of audio and video equipment permitting two-way, real-time interactive communication; or, for treatment of a mental health disorder (including but not limited to prescriptions of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder), two-way real-time audio-only telecommunications if the patient is not capable of, or does not consent to, use of video technology. The DEA and SAMHSA plan to issue final regulations defining when telemedicine prescribing of controlled substances is permitted, which will supersede these temporary rules. For further information contact us .
More Posts
Share by: